This is one of the most over used and ridiculous phrases used in antiwar campaigns. Its a pathetic excuse to use mother nature to express what we truly want. It is true that animals do not have war, the just simply eat each other. Eat. Each. Other. Seriously people, how could you not overlook this crucial fact of the animal kingdom. Things will always eat each other no matter how much we try. Thus using the quote seen above, is thus unjustified. It is merely another example on how uneducated American society can be.

Though war may not be pleasant, it isn't necessarily avoidable. I don't like war myself but there are times that call for it. Sure half the world's modern day hippies may believe it is wrong and some may be right but there truly is no way to measure how justified war can be. War (in my mind) is the most powerful form of communication. Its unignorable. You get your point across and then it is taken notice. Though the other party may be unwilling to listen and not believe the same as you, but other unassociated party's will start to take notice. And by them taking notice they will start to accumulate opinions and hopefully the moral compass takes the correct path. This is one of the only reasons I think war is the correct course of action. Its only called for in special and rare cases. Such as the Holocaust. We couldn't let that one go on.

But take my heed, there are some true nimrods out there. Some that believe that if conflict cannot be removed immediately that the opposing should be destroyed. I have heard on many occasions, from select people, that we should blow up the entire middle east. That is just plain unintelligent and intolerable. True, we are sending troops to help (more like invade) another country and there are casualties doesn't mean that all people are bad. What if we completely removed Germany from the globe? That would have been a disaster.

There are wars out there that we shouldn't have been involved in to begin with. Like the one in the middle east that is currently going on. We were never explicitly asked for assistance (of my knowledge). Why should we be over there. Some say that we are protecting democracy. That type of thinking is more like communism. If the majority of a society is unhappy with a type of government, then it should be changed. Not held the same because someone else who is completely uninvolved says it should stay the same.

I myself don't like the idea of war, I think conflict should be more treated like a large Walmart. That's right, I just said that. We should measure our choices and then choose the best deal. We don't need to destroy what we can't control and shouldn't enforce our beliefs onto others. I'm sure no patriot likes to hear that we should be a communist country, so why can't they feel the same when we make those accusations. We always claim we are protecting the world from communism but what exactly is so bad about it. it may not be the best government system but it sure as hell is not the worst. Some say that the "Child Limit Laws" are terrible. Not really. There is massive over population and the only way to make it stop is to stop the baby flow. No government official is throwing those babies onto the street. That is the people doing that. They broke the law knowingly and they are making a desperate attempt to fix it. I'm sure that most of those parents are so wrenched up over what they did they wish they never had made that choice. And if that doesn't do it for you, think of it this way. There are less communist babies out there to become communist adults.

In short. War is not right. It is not wrong. And nothing is truly fair.